[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUDCBC3HQAL8mpDrj+qoH+R5r-p+jw9hMX9PZGeXGT2cQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 08:30:33 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86/fpu: Simplify fpu->fpregs_active use
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> The fpregs_active() inline function is pretty pointless - in almost
> all the callsites it can be replaced with a direct fpu->fpregs_active
> access.
>
> Do so and eliminate the extra layer of obfuscation.
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists