[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170126155307.GA26069@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:53:07 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86/fpu: Change fpu->fpregs_active users to
fpu->fpstate_active
* Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
> Let me go totally reimplement this whole project in a different way...
Note that I can still be convinced about complicating the FPU state machine as
well if that ends up being the best approach for KVM - but it appears to me (from
a very superficial look) that turning vCPU threads into no-FPU kthreads or
representing the guest FPU state directly with the host FPU context would be even
more beneficial, from the simplicity and KVM performance POV?
> At least I found some good FPU bugs and cleanups along the way.
Absolutely, and your efforts are much appreciated! This ptrace state handling
madness that bit you on SkyLake was something I missed entirely.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists