lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170126170109.6zhoohgodtvxot54@linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:01:09 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Alex Goins <agoins@...dia.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] Align rt_mutex inlining with upstream behavior

On 2017-01-24 18:45:50 [-0800], Alex Goins wrote:
> mutex_destroy is no-op inline when DEBUG_MUTEX is not enabled. The RT Linux
> patches replace mutex_destroy() with rt_mutex_destroy(). This patch aligns
> rt_mutex_destroy() with mutex_destroy() by using the same no-op inline
> technique.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Goins <agoins@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Ritger <aritger@...dia.com>

So what is the problem? Why are we doing this? There is still a check to
see if the lock is in use which is also done for the case where
DEBUG_MUTEX is disabled.

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ