linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] base/memory, hotplug: fix a kernel oops in show_valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2017 22:26:23 +0000
From:   "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
To:     "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     "zhenzhang.zhang@...wei.com" <zhenzhang.zhang@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "abanman@....com" <abanman@....com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] base/memory, hotplug: fix a kernel oops in
 show_valid_zones()

On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 13:52 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:44:15 -0700 Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Reading a sysfs memoryN/valid_zones file leads to the following
> > oops when the first page of a range is not backed by struct page.
> > show_valid_zones() assumes that 'start_pfn' is always valid for
> > page_zone().
> > 
> >  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffea017a000000
> >  IP: show_valid_zones+0x6f/0x160
> > 
> > Since test_pages_in_a_zone() already checks holes, extend this
> > function to return 'valid_start' and 'valid_end' for a given range.
> > show_valid_zones() then proceeds with the valid range.
> 
> This doesn't apply to current mainline due to changes in
> zone_can_shift().  Please redo and resend.

Sorry, I will rebase to the -mm tree and resend the patches.

> Please also update the changelog to provide sufficient information
> for others to decide which kernel(s) need the fix.  In particular:
> under what circumstances will it occur?  On real machines which real
> people own?

Yes, this issue happens on real x86 machines with 64GiB or more memory.
 On such systems, the memory block size is bumped up to 2GiB. [1]

Here is an example system.  0x3240000000 is only aligned by 1GiB and
its memory block starts from 0x3200000000, which is not backed by
struct page.

 BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000003240000000-0x000000603fffffff] usable

I will add the descriptions to the patch.

[1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1411.0/02287.html

Thanks,
-Toshi