[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87efzkx0dd.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 22:17:50 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyasbp@...il.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree\@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] cpuidle:powernv: Add helper function to populate powernv idle states.
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>> "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>>> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> In the current code for powernv_add_idle_states, there is a lot of code
>>> duplication while initializing an idle state in powernv_states table.
>>>
>>> Add an inline helper function to populate the powernv_states[] table
>>> for a given idle state. Invoke this for populating the "Nap",
>>> "Fastsleep" and the stop states in powernv_add_idle_states.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 1 +
>>
>> I was going to merge this, but I see you've touched cpuidle.h, so I feel
>> like I should get an ACK from the cpuidle folks.
>>
>> It's a fairly uncontroversial change, but it's their API.
>
> OK, please add an ACK from me to it then.
Thanks.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists