lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:21:27 -0800 From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com> To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, kexec-ml <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, "vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > I haven't gotten a success/failure build report from zero-day. Not sure what > to make of it. zero-day is generally silent unless it sees a problem. So no news is good news. > But I did try cross-compiling and it was successful. Should that do? I guess so. What tree do these apply to? I tried 4.10-rc5 and "git am" protested ... but I didn't look closely as at why. -Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists