linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 01 Feb 2017 12:11:28 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>,
        Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     "Yu\, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "linux-ia64\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        kexec-ml <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        "vgoyal\@redhat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] ia64: reuse append_elf_note() and final_note() functions

Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hari Bathini
> <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> I haven't gotten a success/failure build report from zero-day. Not sure what
>> to make of it.
>
> zero-day is generally silent unless it sees a problem. So no news is good news.
>
>> But I did try cross-compiling and it was successful. Should that do?
>
> I guess so. What tree do these apply to?  I tried 4.10-rc5 and "git am"
> protested ... but I didn't look closely as at why.

Don't worry about it, I do an ia64_defconfig build as part of my usual
tests before pushing.

cheers