lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:28:39 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 15 at kernel/sched/sched.h:804
 assert_clock_updated.isra.62.part.63+0x25/0x27


* Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:

> On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 11:59 +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jan, at 08:21:05AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > Running Steven's hotplug stress script in tip.today.  Config is
> > > NOPREEMPT, tune for maximum build time (enterprise default-ish).
> > > 
> > > [   75.268049] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
> > > [   75.268052] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
> > > [   75.279994] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 2 APIC 0x4
> > > [   75.294617] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 4 APIC 0x1
> > > [   75.310698] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 5 APIC 0x3
> > > [   75.359056] smpboot: CPU 3 is now offline
> > > [   75.415505] smpboot: CPU 4 is now offline
> > > [   75.479985] smpboot: CPU 5 is now offline
> > > [   75.550674] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [   75.550678] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 15 at kernel/sched/sched.h:804
> > > assert_clock_updated.isra.62.part.63+0x25/0x27
> > > [   75.550679] rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP
> > 
> > The following patch queued in tip/sched/core should fix this issue:
> 
> Weeell, I'll have to take your word for it, as tip g35669bb7fd46 grew
> an early boot brick problem.

That's bad - could you perhaps try to bisect it? All recently queued up patches 
that could cause such problems should be readily bisectable.

The bisection might be faster if you first checked whether 5bf728f02218 works - if 
it does then the bug is in the patches in WIP.x86/boot or WIP.x86/fpu.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ