[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170131143635.GC22283@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:36:35 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shankerd@...eaurora.org,
timur@...eaurora.org, Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@...hat.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Neil Leeder <nleeder@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1009
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 12:42:23PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 06:08:17PM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
> > During a TLB invalidate sequence targeting the inner shareable domain,
> > Falkor may prematurely complete the DSB before all loads and stores using
> > the old translation are observed. Instruction fetches are not subject to
> > the conditions of this erratum. If the original code sequence includes
> > multiple TLB invalidate instructions followed by a single DSB, onle one of
> > the TLB instructions needs to be repeated to work around this erratum.
> > While the erratum only applies to cases in which the TLBI specifies the
> > inner-shareable domain (*IS form of TLBI) and the DSB is ISH form or
> > stronger (OSH, SYS), this changes applies the workaround overabundantly--
> > to local TLBI, DSB NSH sequences as well--for simplicity.
> >
> > Based on work by Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
>
> This looks simple, self-contained, and correct, so FWIW:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>
> Catalin/Will, since we may see a documentation conflict against a timer
> erratum, would you be hapyp to pick up [1] first, fixing up this patch
> as necessary?
>
> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-January/484594.html
I replied over there, but I'd rather just take all the silicon-errata.txt
changes because I don't see them as being dependent on the rest of the
series.
For this patch specifically, I can't merge it until you're happy with the
other workaround, since they conflict.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists