[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1702012036110.4763@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 20:43:51 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
coreteam@...filter.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
info@...lonka.cz, eric@...it.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: nf_ct_helper: warn when not applying
default helper assignment
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > +{
> > + struct nf_conntrack_helper *ret;
> > +
> > + if (!net->ct.sysctl_auto_assign_helper) {
> > + if (net->ct.auto_assign_helper_warned)
> > + return NULL;
> > + if (!find_auto_helper(ct))
>
> This fits in one line, so I think no need for find_auto_helper(), look:
It does, but OTOH we're calling the lookup more than once, and that for me
justifies extra function (with a descriptive name), so that we don't have
to change multiple places in case the data structure changes in the
future.
But I don't have a strong preference either way, so I'll change it.
> > + if (!ret || net->ct.auto_assign_helper_warned)
> > + return ret;
> > + pr_info("nf_conntrack: automatic helper assignment is deprecated and it will "
> > + "be removed soon. Use the iptables CT target to attach helpers "
> > + " instead.\n");
>
> You can probably remove this older message now if you prefer the new
> one you wrote, actually it's a bit redundant IMO.
Fair enough; we'll be issuing the warning in cases where actual "harm"
would be caused, and that should be enough.
I'll trim down the CC list a little bit and submit v3 shortly.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists