linux-kernel - [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:58:16 -0500
From:   Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
To:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, luke@...hjr.org,
        jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com, clm@...com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, 1619918@...s.launchpad.net
Subject: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle
 FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl

On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please consider reverting commit
>> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release.
> What release can I remove it from?
>
> It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's
> reverted in Linus's tree already?
>
> totally confused.
>
> greg k-h

Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in
mainline in v4.7-rc1.  The request should be only for kernels newer than
4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10.

I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline. 

I updated the subject.

Thanks,

Joe