linux-kernel - Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Feb 2017 21:57:00 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, luke@...hjr.org,
        jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.com, clm@...com,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, 1619918@...s.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle
 FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:58:16PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Please consider reverting commit
> >> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release.
> > What release can I remove it from?
> >
> > It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's
> > reverted in Linus's tree already?
> >
> > totally confused.
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in
> mainline in v4.7-rc1.  The request should be only for kernels newer than
> 4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10.
> 
> I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline. 

Let me know when it is reverted, and what that revert commit is please.

thanks,

greg k-h