[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1486288655-8620-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 01:57:35 -0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix the nohz.next_balance update mess
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
The commit:
c5afb6a87f2 ("sched/fair: Fix nohz.next_balance update")
intends to update nohz.next_balance in two steps.
1) The ILB CPU utilizes next_balance variable in nohz_idle_balance()
to gather the shortest next balance of other idle CPUs before
updating nohz.next_balance.
2) The ILB CPU updates the nohz.next_balance according to its own
next_balance after load balance on behalf of other idle CPUs.
However, there is a mess which breaks the original intention of the
first step, every idle CPUs update nohz.next_balance during ILB CPU
on behalf of them to do load balance, and then the ILB CPU utilizes
next_balance variable in nohz_idle_balance() to gather the shortest
next balance of other idle CPUs before updating nohz.next_balance.
This patch fixes it by don't update nohz.next_balance for other idle
CPUs when ILB CPU on behalf of them to do load balance.
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 274c747..83948a4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8750,7 +8750,8 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
* balance for itself and we need to update the
* nohz.next_balance accordingly.
*/
- if ((idle == CPU_IDLE) && time_after(nohz.next_balance, rq->next_balance))
+ if ((idle == CPU_IDLE) && time_after(nohz.next_balance, rq->next_balance) &&
+ !test_bit(NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK, nohz_flags(this_rq()->cpu)))
nohz.next_balance = rq->next_balance;
#endif
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists