linux-kernel - Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 5 Feb 2017 11:33:25 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on
 x86_64

On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:22:55PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Upstream (v4.10-rc6-193-ga572a1b99948), the same command yields no error at all:

That's because you tested Linus' merge commit of the branch which fixed that :-)

IOW, the fix should be:

aaaec6fc7554 ("x86/irq: Make irq activate operations symmetric")

It is on its way to stable too, as we speak.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.