[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170205103325.w5qnzmzveowwkbks@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 11:33:25 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: Regression on next-20170203 spi/for-next 3f87493930a0f qemu on
x86_64
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 05:22:55PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Upstream (v4.10-rc6-193-ga572a1b99948), the same command yields no error at all:
That's because you tested Linus' merge commit of the branch which fixed that :-)
IOW, the fix should be:
aaaec6fc7554 ("x86/irq: Make irq activate operations symmetric")
It is on its way to stable too, as we speak.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists