linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] PM / docs: linux/pm.h kerneldocs update and conversion of two docs to reST

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170206112818.3694cf04@lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:28:18 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] PM / docs: linux/pm.h kerneldocs update and
 conversion of two docs to reST

On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 01:30:08 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:

> This is a new (and hopefully final) iteration of the series of patches starting
> the conversion of power management driver API documentation.
> 
> Patch [1/3] updates kerneldoc comments in include/linux/pm.h (to make the
> documentation generated out of them look better), patch [2/3] converts
> Documentation/power/devices.txt to reST, and patch [3/3] does the same thing
> to Documentation/power/notifiers.txt (the new files go into the driver-api subdir
> and are hooked up to that manual).
> 
> Patch [1/3] has not been changed since the previous iteration.  Patch [2/3]
> addresses some comments from Lukas and patch [3/3] has been trivially
> rebased.
> 
> Please apply unless there are any objections.

Just applied them, thanks.

One thing I do notice is that, while you update the kerneldoc comments,
nothing in the associated documentation pulls them in.  That would be a
good future enhancement...:)

Thanks,

jon