lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 22:08:44 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] PM / docs: linux/pm.h kerneldocs update and
 conversion of two docs to reST

On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 01:30:08 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>
>> This is a new (and hopefully final) iteration of the series of patches starting
>> the conversion of power management driver API documentation.
>>
>> Patch [1/3] updates kerneldoc comments in include/linux/pm.h (to make the
>> documentation generated out of them look better), patch [2/3] converts
>> Documentation/power/devices.txt to reST, and patch [3/3] does the same thing
>> to Documentation/power/notifiers.txt (the new files go into the driver-api subdir
>> and are hooked up to that manual).
>>
>> Patch [1/3] has not been changed since the previous iteration.  Patch [2/3]
>> addresses some comments from Lukas and patch [3/3] has been trivially
>> rebased.
>>
>> Please apply unless there are any objections.
>
> Just applied them, thanks.

Thank you!

> One thing I do notice is that, while you update the kerneldoc comments,
> nothing in the associated documentation pulls them in.  That would be a
> good future enhancement...:)

They are pulled in by patch [2/3] via types.rst (AFAICS).

I guess that's a bit confusing (sorry about that), but I wanted to
avoid putting too much stuff into one patch.

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists