[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170206160443.55c0f1daac793f1464053cd6@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:04:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sigaltstack: support SS_AUTODISARM for
CONFIG_COMPAT
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:30:38 +0300 Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru> wrote:
> 05.02.2017 21:31, Andy Lutomirski __________:
> > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru> wrote:
> >> Currently SS_AUTODISARM is not supported in compatibility
> >> mode, but does not return -EINVAL either. This makes dosemu
> >> built with -m32 on x86_64 to crash. Also the kernel's sigaltstack
> >> selftest fails if compiled with -m32.
> >>
> >> This patch adds the needed support.
> >>
> >> Suggesting for -stable.
> > This looks correct.
> So it seems my patches haven't made it into LKML
> and I don't know if they made it into stable@ because
> the archive link:
> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable
> doesn't work.
> There is definitely something wrong here.
>
> So did they pass into a stable ML?
> If not, Andy can I use your Acked-by when/if resending?
> Are there any known problems with MLs and the archives now?
I have a copy of [1/2] because I was on cc. I cannot locate a copy of
[2/2]. Please cc Oleg on signal-related changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists