linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] sigaltstack: support SS_AUTODISARM for CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:30:38 +0300
From:   Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:     Helge Deller <deller@....de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sigaltstack: support SS_AUTODISARM for CONFIG_COMPAT

05.02.2017 21:31, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru> wrote:
>> Currently SS_AUTODISARM is not supported in compatibility
>> mode, but does not return -EINVAL either. This makes dosemu
>> built with -m32 on x86_64 to crash. Also the kernel's sigaltstack
>> selftest fails if compiled with -m32.
>>
>> This patch adds the needed support.
>>
>> Suggesting for -stable.
> This looks correct.
So it seems my patches haven't made it into LKML
and I don't know if they made it into stable@ because
the archive link:
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable
doesn't work.
There is definitely something wrong here.

So did they pass into a stable ML?
If not, Andy can I use your Acked-by when/if resending?
Are there any known problems with MLs and the archives now?