lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acc83b35-6dd6-9cd0-6f7c-e0aa3f866ed0@nod.at>
Date:   Tue, 7 Feb 2017 20:33:53 +0100
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Zach Brown <zach.brown@...com>, dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc:     computersforpeace@...il.com, boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
        dedekind1@...il.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] mtd: ubi: use 'max_bad_blocks' to compute
 bad_peb_limit if available

Am 10.01.2017 um 20:30 schrieb Zach Brown:
> From: Jeff Westfahl <jeff.westfahl@...com>
> 
> If the user has not set max_beb_per1024 using either the cmdline or
> Kconfig options for doing so, use the MTD function 'max_bad_blocks' to
> compute the UBI bad_peb_limit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Westfahl <jeff.westfahl@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zach.brown@...com>
> Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electron.com>

Does this patch go via the MTD tree?
In this case:
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ