linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] sunvnet: straighten up message event handling logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170208155947.GE30741@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2017 07:59:47 -0800
From:   Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To:     Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/9] sunvnet: straighten up message event
 handling logic

On (02/07/17 14:12), Shannon Nelson wrote:
> +
> +	/* we don't expect any other bits */
> +	BUG_ON(port->rx_event & ~(LDC_EVENT_DATA_READY |
> +				  LDC_EVENT_RESET |
> +				  LDC_EVENT_UP));
> +
> +	/* RESET takes precedent over any other event */
> +	if (port->rx_event & LDC_EVENT_RESET) { 
                  :
>  		port->rx_event = 0;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> +	if (port->rx_event & LDC_EVENT_UP) {
> +		vio_link_state_change(vio, LDC_EVENT_UP);
> +		port->rx_event = 0;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>  
>  	err = 0;
>  	tx_wakeup = 0;

IIRC there were timing-related situations where you can get woken up with
both UP and DATA_READY, and if my reading of your patch is 
correct, we would ignore the DATA_READY, and return, right?

--Sowmini