[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170209014807.GO3407@dragon>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:48:09 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, jun.nie@...aro.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org, vinod.koul@...el.com,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
xie.baoyou@....com.cn, chen.chaokai@....com.cn,
wang.qiang01@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:52:07PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 11:02:34AM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> > ZTE's zx2967 I2S controller driver introduces pclk, this
> > patch documents this fact.
>
> Now we have the same subject for patches 2 and 3.
>
> Personally, I'd prefer "dt-bindings: sound: blah...", but not enough to
> argue with Mark about it. If that is not the prefix, then it should at
> least have "binding" in the subject.
+1
The prefix of sound bindings is quite unique from other subsystems.
Looking at the prefix of Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/
commits, I'm always confused whether it's a pure binding commit
or just submitted as part of the driver patch. I feel that we
kinda lose the point of having a prefix.
Just my 2 cents.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists