linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:06:25 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com, jun.nie@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org, perex@...ex.cz,
        tiwai@...e.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org, vinod.koul@...el.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        xie.baoyou@....com.cn, chen.chaokai@....com.cn,
        wang.qiang01@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: zx-i2s: introduce pclk for zx2967 family

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:48:09AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:52:07PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

> > Personally, I'd prefer "dt-bindings: sound: blah...", but not enough to 
> > argue with Mark about it. If that is not the prefix, then it should at 
> > least have "binding" in the subject.

> +1

> The prefix of sound bindings is quite unique from other subsystems.
> Looking at the prefix of Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/
> commits, I'm always confused whether it's a pure binding commit
> or just submitted as part of the driver patch.  I feel that we
> kinda lose the point of having a prefix.

That's really not what's happening reliably - other subsystems also seem
to have a bunch of things prefixed for the subsystem and the DT specific
prefixes are all over the shop, people seem to be making them up at
random.  If DT binding review were something that reliably and
consistently happened and didn't affect the subsystem I'd perhaps buy it
but for run of the mill stuff it seems like getting things reviewed in
the subsystem is more important.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)