[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39b1c6ec-408c-bb92-f937-d477afa626a5@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 21:35:26 +0100
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: sean.wang@...iatek.com, rpurdie@...ys.net, lee.jones@...aro.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keyhaede@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] leds: Add LED support for MT6323 PMIC
On 02/09/2017 03:23 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Register for MT6323_ISINK_CON0 to setup the
>>> + * duty cycle of the blink
>>> + */
>>> +#define MT6323_ISINK_CON0(i) (MT6323_ISINK0_CON0 + 0x8 * (i))
>>> +#define MT6323_ISINK_DIM_DUTY_MASK (0x1f << 8)
>>> +#define MT6323_ISINK_DIM_DUTY(i) (((i) << 8) & \
>>> + MT6323_ISINK_DIM_DUTY_MASK)
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Register to setup the period of the blink
>>> + */
>>
>> This fits in a single line, so can be wrapped with /* */ like :
>
> People do this to make blocks stand out, and to make it similar to other blocks
> above. I believe this is ok.
It generates unnecessary lines of code, but I'm not going to
argue, let's leave it to the developer's taste.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists