[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170209201416.GS2267@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 12:14:16 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 05/37] thp: try to free page's buffers before attempt
split
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:57:47PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> @@ -2146,6 +2146,23 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /* Try to free buffers before attempt split */
> + if (!PageSwapBacked(head) && PagePrivate(page)) {
> + /*
> + * We cannot trigger writeback from here due possible
> + * recursion if triggered from vmscan, only wait.
> + *
> + * Caller can trigger writeback it on its own, if safe.
> + */
It took me a few reads to get this. May I suggest:
/*
* Cannot split a page with buffers. If the caller has
* already started writeback, we can wait for it to finish,
* but we cannot start writeback if we were called from vmscan
*/
> + if (!PageSwapBacked(head) && PagePrivate(page)) {
Also, it looks weird to test PageSwapBacked of *head* and PagePrivate
of *page*. I think it's correct, but it still looks weird.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists