[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874lzyct6h.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 22:54:14 +1300
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc/sysctl: prune stale dentries during unregistering
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru> writes:
> On 10.02.2017 10:47, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:35:02AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>>
>>> # time sysctl -a > /dev/null
>>> real 1m12.806s
>>> user 0m0.016s
>>> sys 1m12.400s
>>>
>>> Currently only memory reclaimer could remove this garbage.
>>> But without significant memory pressure this never happens.
>>>
>>> This patch collects sysctl inodes into list on sysctl table header and
>>> prunes all their dentries once that table unregisters.
>>
>> I'd probably go for hlist, but that's mostly cosmetic difference; how about
>> the matching stats *after* that patch?
>>
>
> dcache size doesn't grow endlessly, so stats are fine
>
> # sysctl fs.dentry-state
> fs.dentry-state = 92712 58376 45 0 0 0
>
> # time sysctl -a &>/dev/null
>
> real 0m0.013s
> user 0m0.004s
> sys 0m0.008s
Applied thanks,
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists