[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26fa33ed-365e-f4c9-9270-421420c16163@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:54:07 +0300
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc/sysctl: prune stale dentries during unregistering
On 10.02.2017 10:47, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:35:02AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
>> # time sysctl -a > /dev/null
>> real 1m12.806s
>> user 0m0.016s
>> sys 1m12.400s
>>
>> Currently only memory reclaimer could remove this garbage.
>> But without significant memory pressure this never happens.
>>
>> This patch collects sysctl inodes into list on sysctl table header and
>> prunes all their dentries once that table unregisters.
>
> I'd probably go for hlist, but that's mostly cosmetic difference; how about
> the matching stats *after* that patch?
>
dcache size doesn't grow endlessly, so stats are fine
# sysctl fs.dentry-state
fs.dentry-state = 92712 58376 45 0 0 0
# time sysctl -a &>/dev/null
real 0m0.013s
user 0m0.004s
sys 0m0.008s
Powered by blists - more mailing lists