[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170210074715.GN13195@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 07:47:16 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc/sysctl: prune stale dentries during unregistering
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:35:02AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> # time sysctl -a > /dev/null
> real 1m12.806s
> user 0m0.016s
> sys 1m12.400s
>
> Currently only memory reclaimer could remove this garbage.
> But without significant memory pressure this never happens.
>
> This patch collects sysctl inodes into list on sysctl table header and
> prunes all their dentries once that table unregisters.
I'd probably go for hlist, but that's mostly cosmetic difference; how about
the matching stats *after* that patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists