lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702131122070.3619@nanos>
Date:   Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:24:46 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/33] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Macro-ize
 its_send_single_command

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +
> +static __its_send_single_cmd(its_send_single_command, its_cmd_builder_t,
> +			     struct its_collection, its_build_sync_cmd)

I'm fine with that macro magic, but the above is very unintuitive as it
looks like a normal function.

The way this is done in other places is to have:

#define BUILD_CMD_FUNC(name,....) \
....

and then have

BUILD_CMD_FUNC(its_send_single_command, ....);

That makes it entirely obvious that this is macro magic.

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ