[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170213190839.GI10256@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:08:39 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: bob smith <sfmc68@...izon.net>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rth@...ddle.net,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com,
stern@...land.harvard.edu, j.alglave@....ac.uk,
luc.maranget@...ia.fr, parri.andrea@...il.com,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about DEC Alpha memory ordering
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 01:53:27PM -0500, bob smith wrote:
> On 2/13/17 1:39 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > can real DEC Alpha hardware end up with both instances of "r1"
> > having the value 1?
>
> I thought this question reminded me of something, so I found this:
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
>
> and I pasted in the content - David Howells is one of the authors and
> maybe that is why the question sort of reminded me.
>
> Maybe someone has an update but this is what was said then.
>
> ============================
> LINUX KERNEL MEMORY BARRIERS
> ============================
>
> By: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There's only one Paul E. McKenney.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists