[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702132027300.3790@nanos>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:28:21 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
cc: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/vdso: Add VCLOCK_HVCLOCK vDSO clock read
method
On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> >> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@...utronix.de]
> >> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 02:02
> >> ...
> >> That's important if the stuff happens cross CPU. If the update happens on
> >> the same CPU then this is a different story and as there are VMexits
> >> involved they might provide the required ordering already. But I can't tell
> >> as I have no idea how that host side thing is done.
> >>
> >> tglx
> >
> > IMO Hyper-V TSC page clocksource here seems pretty similar to KVM's pvclock,
> > So I would guess "the structure is only updated just before reentering the guest
> > after some VM event" (https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/kvm-pvclock/),
> > that is, the update should happen on the same CPU, I guess.
>
> If the patch is correct, there is one of these shared by all vCPUs, so
> this is not a sufficient explanation.
Right, because that's ony ONE TSC page for the whole guest and then the seq
stuff really lacks barriers.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists