linux-kernel - Re: PATCH] cpufreq: Do not clear real

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170214034703.GC3537@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:17:03 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH] cpufreq: Do not clear real_cpus mask on policy init

On 13-02-17, 13:44, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> If new_policy is set in cpufreq_online(), the policy object has just
> been created and its real_cpus mask has been zeroed on allocation,
> and the driver's ->init() callback should not touch it.
> 
> It doesn't need to be cleared again, so don't do that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c |    2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1166,8 +1166,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int c
>  	if (new_policy) {
>  		/* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */
>  		cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
> -		/* Clear mask of registered CPUs */
> -		cpumask_clear(policy->real_cpus);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh