[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170214170836.2705798-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:08:30 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fix len comparison in xfs_extent_busy_trim
The length is now passed by reference, so the assertion has to be updated
to match the other changes, as pointed out by this W=1 warning:
fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c: In function 'xfs_extent_busy_trim':
fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c:356:13: error: ordered comparison of pointer with integer zero [-Werror=extra]
Fixes: ebf55872616c ("xfs: improve handling of busy extents in the low-level allocator")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
index ab062610234e..77760dbf0242 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ xfs_extent_busy_trim(
struct rb_node *rbp;
bool ret = false;
- ASSERT(len > 0);
+ ASSERT(*len > 0);
spin_lock(&args->pag->pagb_lock);
restart:
--
2.9.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists