[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874lzwlmch.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 19:21:34 +0200
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fail event scheduling on conflict with VMX
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:17:30PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> This is called by pmu::add(), which checks hw.state afterwards and if it
>> finds HES_STOPPED, it returns an error, which event_sched_in() captures
>> and keeps the event in INACTIVE state. Should I add a comment about it?
>
> Egads... so what if ->add() succeeds but we then hit this on
> ->stop()/->start() due to throttle or period adjust?
It will hang there with hw.state==PERF_HES_STOPPED till the next
sched_out. But that will be the case anyway if VMXON kicks in while PT
is running.
> Now I suppose PT will never normally hit either of those, but you can do
> IOC_PERIOD on it, just for giggles.
True. Should we worry?
> Yes, this very much needs a comment... Also, should not this then live
> in ->add() in the first place?
The output_stop() stuff in the mmap_close path relies on
perf_aux_output_end() being in ->stop(), let me think if there's more.
Regards,
--
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists