linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 2/2] brcmfmac: don't warn user about NVRAM if fallback to platform one succeeds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170216072636.7128-2-zajec5@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:26:36 +0100
From:   Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
        "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] brcmfmac: don't warn user about NVRAM if fallback to platform one succeeds

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>

Failing to load NVRAM file isn't critical if we manage to get platform
one in the fallback path. It means warnings like:
[   10.801506] brcmfmac 0000:01:00.0: Direct firmware load for brcm/brcmfmac43602-pcie.txt failed with error -2
are unnecessary & disturbing for people with platform NVRAM. This is
very common case for Broadcom home routers.

So instead of printing warning immediately with the firmware subsystem
let's first try our fallback code. If that fails as well, then it's a
right moment to print an error.

This should reduce amount of false reports from users seeing this
warning while having wireless working perfectly fine.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
---
V2: Update commit message as it wasn't clear enough (thanks Andy) & add extra
    messages to the firmware.c.

Kalle, Arend: this patch is strictly related to the bigger 1/2. Could you ack
this change as I expect this patchset to be picked by Ming, Luis or Greg?
---
 .../net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c  | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c
index c7c1e9906500..510a76d99eee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/firmware.c
@@ -462,8 +462,14 @@ static void brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx)
 		raw_nvram = false;
 	} else {
 		data = bcm47xx_nvram_get_contents(&data_len);
-		if (!data && !(fwctx->flags & BRCMF_FW_REQ_NV_OPTIONAL))
-			goto fail;
+		if (!data) {
+			brcmf_dbg(TRACE, "Failed to get platform NVRAM\n");
+			if (!(fwctx->flags & BRCMF_FW_REQ_NV_OPTIONAL)) {
+				brcmf_err("Loading NVRAM from %s and using platform one both failed\n",
+					  fwctx->nvram_name);
+				goto fail;
+			}
+		}
 		raw_nvram = true;
 	}
 
@@ -504,9 +510,9 @@ static void brcmf_fw_request_code_done(const struct firmware *fw, void *ctx)
 		return;
 	}
 	fwctx->code = fw;
-	ret = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, true, fwctx->nvram_name,
-				      fwctx->dev, GFP_KERNEL, fwctx,
-				      brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done);
+	ret = request_firmware_async(THIS_MODULE, FW_OPT_NO_WARN,
+				     fwctx->nvram_name, fwctx->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
+				     fwctx, brcmf_fw_request_nvram_done);
 
 	if (!ret)
 		return;
-- 
2.11.0