[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f2ecf62-6557-cb3f-c98d-082b92dfac80@santannapisa.it>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:36:07 +0100
From: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Romulo Silva de Oliveira <romulo.deoliveira@...c.br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when
calculating overflow
On 15/02/2017 14:33, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> [1] For the sake of completeness:
> - dl_se->deadline = Absolute deadline
> - dl_se->dl_deadline = Relative deadline
Daniel's note [1] reminds me that, would it be worth a rename of these, for the sake of clarity, e.g.:
-) abs_deadline vs rel_deadline
-) runtime_left vs runtime_tot
or similar :-) ?
T.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists