[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170216114757.77d24d68@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:47:57 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Romulo Silva de Oliveira <romulo.deoliveira@...c.br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when
calculating overflow
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:36:07 +0100
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it> wrote:
> On 15/02/2017 14:33, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> > [1] For the sake of completeness:
> > - dl_se->deadline = Absolute deadline
> > - dl_se->dl_deadline = Relative deadline
> Daniel's note [1] reminds me that, would it be worth a rename of these, for the sake of clarity, e.g.:
> -) abs_deadline vs rel_deadline
> -) runtime_left vs runtime_tot
> or similar :-) ?
+1 as I seem to get confused by it too.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists