lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:54:52 +0000 From: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@....com> To: Daniel Stone <daniel@...ishbar.org> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>, Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@...el.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/color: Document CTM eqations What's the verdict? We've got [1] which is about to become another (driver) implementation - better to change before that merges than after I guess. -Brian [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/13/304 On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:56:55AM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: >Hi, > >On 15 February 2017 at 11:39, Ville Syrjälä ><ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:46:39PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Ville Syrjälä >>> <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com> wrote: >>> > Hmm. Two's complement is what I was thinking it is. Which shows that >>> > I never managed to read the code in any detail. Definitely needs to >>> > be documented properly. >>> >>> That sounds supremely backwards. I guess we can't fix this anymore? >> >> I have no idea. Anyone else? > >I don't know of any implementation using this; maybe closed Intel >Android stuff? Certainly GitHub showed no-one using it, and neither X >nor Weston/Mutter are using it yet. > >Cheers, >Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists