[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170220111727.7vohleiu2btmsx3g@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 12:17:27 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, hpa@...or.com,
Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: convert threshold_bank.cpus from atomic_t to
refcount_t
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 01:06:19PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
That SOB chain tells me that you wrote the patch and Hans, Kees and
David handled it in some way and the last one - David - is sending it to
me. It doesn't look like that though.
So what are you trying to express with it?
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst has some info on the whole
SOB deal:
11) Sign your work — the Developer's Certificate of Origin
----------------------------------------------------------
..
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists