[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcFc77xJLR_xFTxRZPy0bLcB4D+x7aQfHE1wXfqJ0aFGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 13:47:49 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
daniel.baluta@...il.com, amsfield22@...il.com,
Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...g-vd.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Split driver into core and I2C
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 02:41:12PM +0800, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 01:11:29PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> > On 16/02/17 10:02, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
>> Hello Jonathan,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback. I amended the relevant commits as you say and
>> git detects the file adxl345.c -> adxl345_core.c as 78% renamed. The
>> reason for that percentage is that I did some probe/remove renames and
>> some other deletions here and there. Should I commit them separately in
>> order to get the move detection to work?
>>
>
> Moved the deletions/modifications into patch 1. I hope I got it right
> this time?
I'm not a Jonathan, but there my remarks.
1. Yes, this version looks better.
2. Just a hint: check -M (for move) and -C (for copy) parameters to
git format-patch.
3. And please avoid over quoting when answering mails.
Thanks.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists