linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: Skip unknown key messages 0x50 0x51

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vem5Rxa+Ms5zop2zCHqExQfv9WPufQ6jPdCBpQQh0AN=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:38:59 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin.shar@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        acpi4asus-user <acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        "dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeepc-laptop: Skip unknown key messages 0x50 0x51

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin.shar@...il.com> wrote:

> If we have user space tools supporting and using this type of event,
> then what about adding them properly with a define + entry in the
> structure array so that it can be standardized and on top get rid of
> those kernel message every time I (un)plug the charger? Would that be
> welcomed? I could send a new patch as specified above, adding the
> KEY_CHARING_ON/OFF defines + add entries to eeepc_keymap.

Please, do not top posting.

Dmitry, do we have special events for AC (un)plug? What is the best
approach in your opinion?

>> On Feb 18, 2017 17:16, "Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin.shar@...il.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Otherwise those are printed several times when (un)plugging the AC
>>> connector.
>>
>> If we have a user space tool that supports them better not to ignore.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko