linux-kernel - Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87poibb9ze.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:49:09 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jikos@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0200
>
>> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>> 
>>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
>>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200
>>>
>>>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older
>>>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still.
>>>
>>> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
>>> today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.
>>>
>>> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks.
>> 
>> We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant
>> to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit
>> you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the
>> week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291.
>> 
>> Does that sound ok to you?
>
> Sure.

Here's the revert:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/730735/

I didn't send a pull request because that felt overkill to do just for
one patch.

-- 
Kalle Valo