linux-kernel - Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:00:21 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     kvalo@...eaurora.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, jikos@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath10k regression on XPS13

From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:49:09 +0200

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> 
>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0200
>>
>>> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>>> 
>>>> From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
>>>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:32:49 +0200
>>>>
>>>>> We are working on a fix so that ath10k continues to work with older
>>>>> board-2.bin, but that might take a day or two still.
>>>>
>>>> Kalle I really wanted to send my net-next pull request to Linus later
>>>> today.  But I guess I have to wait for this ath10k first.
>>>>
>>>> Please get this to me as soon as possible, thanks.
>>> 
>>> We have a fix now but it's not really tested that well so I'm reluctant
>>> to submit it yet. As I don't want to make you wait I think I'll submit
>>> you a patch reverting f2593cb1b291 in an hour or two. And later in the
>>> week I send you a properly fixed (and tested) version of f2593cb1b291.
>>> 
>>> Does that sound ok to you?
>>
>> Sure.
> 
> Here's the revert:
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/730735/
> 
> I didn't send a pull request because that felt overkill to do just for
> one patch.

Yep, that's fine.