linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM TSS cleanups and speedups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bdcd55-b6c2-257f-e3f8-eea7223d26bb@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2017 16:25:18 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM TSS cleanups and speedups



On 22/02/2017 16:17, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> I pushed and tagged before seeing this v2. :(  The differences seem to
>> be x86-only, so I suppose Ingo can handle them if you resubmit.
>>
> I renamed the helpers to make it less likely that someone would repeat
> my little buglet.  I can submit a patch that just has the differences,
> but I think it should go in through your tree.  Would that work?

That's fine for me as long as it is for Ingo. :)

Paolo