[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6fa565f-28ce-f488-dd1e-b5d010c6409a@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:11:52 -0600
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: shankerd@...eaurora.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Vikram Sethi <vikrams@...eaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Fix the kernel panic() on QDF2400 platform
On 02/23/2017 03:05 PM, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> Why do you want keep 'pre_ttbr0_update_workaround' in subject, nothing
> wrong with macro definition itself. Problem with the caller, not passing
> the right arguments.
Ok, how about this:
arm64: qcom: do not use x1 when calling pre_ttbr0_update_workaround
"Fix the kernel panic() on QDF2400 platform" could mean almost anything.
There could plenty of future kernel panics on the QDF2400.
Also, I think our legal review would insist on saying "Qualcomm Technologies
QDF2400", which would make the line too long.
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists