lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2017 05:01:43 +0100
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Remove leftover cputime_to_nsecs call causing
 build error

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 08:34:15AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > This type conversion is a leftover that got ignored during the kcpustat
> > conversion to nanosecs, resulting in build breakage with config having
> > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=y.
> >
> > 	arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c: In function 'running_clock':
> > 	arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:712:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'cputime_to_nsecs' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 	  return local_clock() - cputime_to_nsecs(kcpustat_this_cpu->cpustat[CPUTIME_STEAL]);
> >
> > All we need is to remove it.
> >
> > Reported-by: Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> > Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> 
> 
> Are you going to send this to Linus, or should I?

I would prefer you send it to Linus if you don't mind.

The fate of a powerpc patch sent by me directly to Linus is
anything but predictable :o)

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists