[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170224143015.6441-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:30:15 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: fix missing spin_unlock on sql_list_lock
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
In the case where sglq is null, the current code just returns without
unlocking the spinlock sql_list_lock. Fix this by breaking out of the
while loop and the exit path will then unlock and return NULL as was
the original intention.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1411635 ("Missing unlock")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
index 1fba5dc..40720bb 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ __lpfc_sli_get_els_sglq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *piocbq)
start_sglq = sglq;
while (!found) {
if (!sglq)
- return NULL;
+ break;
if (ndlp && ndlp->active_rrqs_xri_bitmap &&
test_bit(sglq->sli4_lxritag,
ndlp->active_rrqs_xri_bitmap)) {
--
2.10.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists