[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4692bdb2-dabb-a9bb-90f3-0678ab0fd26e@broadcom.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 09:42:50 -0800
From: James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: fix missing spin_unlock on sql_list_lock
Looks good. I included it in the lpfc patch set just posted.
-- james
On 2/24/2017 6:30 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> In the case where sglq is null, the current code just returns without
> unlocking the spinlock sql_list_lock. Fix this by breaking out of the
> while loop and the exit path will then unlock and return NULL as was
> the original intention.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1411635 ("Missing unlock")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> index 1fba5dc..40720bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c
> @@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ __lpfc_sli_get_els_sglq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_iocbq *piocbq)
> start_sglq = sglq;
> while (!found) {
> if (!sglq)
> - return NULL;
> + break;
> if (ndlp && ndlp->active_rrqs_xri_bitmap &&
> test_bit(sglq->sli4_lxritag,
> ndlp->active_rrqs_xri_bitmap)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists