[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1487961857.2575.8.camel@sandisk.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:44:55 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To: "paolo.valente@...aro.org" <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
CC: "ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [WIP PATCHSET 0/4] WIP branch for bfq-mq
On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:29 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> thanks for this second attempt of yours. Although, unfortunately, not
> providing some clear indication of the exact cause of your hang (apart
> from a possible deadlock), your log helped me notice another bug.
>
> At any rate, as I have just written to Jens, I have pushed a new
> version of the branch [1] (not just added new commits, but also
> integrated some old commit with new changes, to make it more quickly).
> The branch now contains both a fix for the above bug, and, more
> importantly, a fix for the circular dependencies that were still
> lurking around. Could you please test it?
Hello Paolo,
I have good news: the same test system boots normally with the same
kernel config I used during my previous tests and with the latest
bfq-mq code (commit a965d19585c0) merged with kernel v4.10.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists