[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <19D7658C-BF04-4A52-AD1D-37842AE1E8C0@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 18:45:58 +0100
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Cc: "ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [WIP PATCHSET 0/4] WIP branch for bfq-mq
> Il giorno 24 feb 2017, alle ore 19:44, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com> ha scritto:
>
> On Wed, 2017-02-22 at 22:29 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> thanks for this second attempt of yours. Although, unfortunately, not
>> providing some clear indication of the exact cause of your hang (apart
>> from a possible deadlock), your log helped me notice another bug.
>>
>> At any rate, as I have just written to Jens, I have pushed a new
>> version of the branch [1] (not just added new commits, but also
>> integrated some old commit with new changes, to make it more quickly).
>> The branch now contains both a fix for the above bug, and, more
>> importantly, a fix for the circular dependencies that were still
>> lurking around. Could you please test it?
>
> Hello Paolo,
>
Hi
> I have good news: the same test system boots normally with the same
> kernel config I used during my previous tests and with the latest
> bfq-mq code (commit a965d19585c0) merged with kernel v4.10.
>
Whew, I was longing for you reply, thanks :)
Should you want to have a look at it, I have just finished completing
cgroups support too, as you have probably already read from my
previous email.
Thanks,
Paolo
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists