[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170224195722.GM3595@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 16:57:22 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function
entry offset
Em Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:23:38PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu:
> With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry
> point.
So, I think I can carry the first one via Ingo, etc, what about this
one?
Is it ok for me to process it?
Seems simple enough, has been thru a lot of discussion, but would be
better if it was Reviewed-by the PPC maintainers or else just processed
by them.
Please advise,
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 735ff3d3f77d..e37b76b8b6b2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,15 @@ static void __kprobes set_current_kprobe(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> kcb->kprobe_saved_msr = regs->msr;
> }
>
> +bool arch_function_offset_within_entry(unsigned long offset)
> +{
> +#ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v2
> + return offset <= 8;
> +#else
> + return !offset;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> --
> 2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists